Publication: English Reading Strategies Used by Thai Students with Different English Exposures from Different Educational Institutions
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2016
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
en
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
0858-0855 (Print), 2730-3543 (Online)
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
ABAC Journal
Volume
36
Issue
1
Edition
Start Page
47
End Page
67
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
English Reading Strategies Used by Thai Students with Different English Exposures from Different Educational Institutions
Alternative Title(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
This study aims to examine the English reading strategies employed by science students who are studying in the higher educational institutions in the Northeast of Thailand. Specifically, it has two purposes which are: 1) to investigate the frequency of reading strategies employed by students studying at public and private educational institutions, and 2) to examine whether the choices of reading strategies used vary significantly among the students’ types of institutions, and English exposures. Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) questionnaires were administered to 549 undergraduate students. The statistical methods used to analyze the data were mean score (x̄), Standard Deviation (S.D), and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The findings reveal that 1) science students reported moderate level of strategies used both in overall use and in the three main categories, and 2) types of institutions and English exposures affected the students’ strategies choices.