Publication: Marx Unmasked? The “Siamese Intellectual” and a (Mis) Reading of Karl Marx in Thailand
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2021
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
en
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
วารสารสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร
Journal of Social Sciences Naresuan University
Journal of Social Sciences Naresuan University
Volume
18
Issue
1
Edition
Start Page
1
End Page
31
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
Marx Unmasked? The “Siamese Intellectual” and a (Mis) Reading of Karl Marx in Thailand
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
In recent years, new biographies of Karl Marx have emerged in the English-speaking world, and they give a fresh reading of Marx’s ideas and personal life by putting them back into the historical context of his time. In Thailand, unfortunately, local readers do not have the same privilege as there have not been original and full biographies of Marx written by Thai authors. What appears to be a silver lining for Thai readers is that Sulak Sivaraksa, one of the most renowned and well-respected intellectuals in Thai academia who has widely been known as the “Siamese Intellectual,” wants to break new paths. He writes a substantial account of Marx’s personal background, the impact of the historical contexts of his time on his intellectual development, and the tension between how he acted privately and what he discussed in public. However, this article argues that Sulak’s take on Marx is wide of the mark. Rather than demythologising Marx, Sulak ends up reproducing myths and misunderstandings surrounding the man. Instead of a critical assessment, Sulak’s take on Marx is conservative to the core. It does not just conflate Marx with Marxism, Stalinism, and Maoism
it also casts doubt on Marx’s ideas by condemning his personal flaws. On top of that, Sulak makes several comments about Marx that lack of evidence.
it also casts doubt on Marx’s ideas by condemning his personal flaws. On top of that, Sulak makes several comments about Marx that lack of evidence.