Publication: Students' Perspective: Three Types of Reflective Written Feedback
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2018
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
en
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
0858-0855 (Print), 2730-3543 (Online)
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
ABAC Journal
Volume
38
Issue
2
Edition
Start Page
67
End Page
81
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
Students' Perspective: Three Types of Reflective Written Feedback
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
To enhance one’s writing ability, different types of feedback have been employed in language writing classes. Some are more effective than others in specific learning atmospheres. This paper reveals the attitudes of thirty-four English major sophomores toward three types of reflective written feedback: self-, peer-, and teacher-reflective written feedback through a five-point Likert type rating scale attitude questionnaire. According to the analysis of their responses, the findings indicated that teacher-reflective written feedback was unquestionably the best and most effective feedback source to help develop their writing performance, especially beyond the boundary of grammatical improvement. Self- and peer- reflective written feedback, nevertheless, were both perceived as other significant sources of useful feedback, particularly on grammatical aspects, whereas their limited language proficiency was raised as a rudimentary obstacle to overcome when carrying out these two tasks. Some profound and far-reaching pedagogical implications were taken into account based on the results of the study.