Publication: พหุวัฒนธรรมกับ “วาทกรรมวัฒนธรรม” ประวัติศาสตร์แนวคิด
A Conceptual history
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2016
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
th
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
0125-135X
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
รัฐศาสตร์สาร
Journal of Political Science
Journal of Political Science
Volume
37
Issue
3
Edition
Start Page
200
End Page
266
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
พหุวัฒนธรรมกับ “วาทกรรมวัฒนธรรม” ประวัติศาสตร์แนวคิด
A Conceptual history
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
There are no simple concepts. Every concept has component and is defined by them is therefore has a combination. (chiffre). It is a multiplicity, although not every multiplicity is conceptual. There is no concept with only one component...Every concept has an irregular contour defined by the sum of its components, which is why...we find the idea of the concept being a matter of articulation, of cutting and cross-cutting. The concept is a whole because it totalizes its components, but it is a fragmentary whole.