Publication: พระสูตรที่นิกายวาตสีปุตรียะไม่ยอมรับว่าเป็นพระพุทธพจน์: ศึกษาในคัมภีร์อภิธรรมโกศภาษยะและกถาวัตถุ
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2019
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
th
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
2651-219X (Online)
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
วารสารพุทธศาสน์ศึกษา จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย
Volume
26
Issue
2
Edition
Start Page
120
End Page
163
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
พระสูตรที่นิกายวาตสีปุตรียะไม่ยอมรับว่าเป็นพระพุทธพจน์: ศึกษาในคัมภีร์อภิธรรมโกศภาษยะและกถาวัตถุ
Alternative Title(s)
Non-acceptance of Sūtra as the word of Buddha(Buddhavacana) by Vātśīputrīya: A case study in Abhidharmakośabhāṣya and Kathāvatthu
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
This article exemplifi es a Sūtra that is claimed to not be ‘the word of the Buddha’ (Buddha- vacana) by Vātśīputrīya, a sect of Buddhism. This Sūtra is composed of verses presenting an argument between Śaila bhikṣuṇi and Māra. The VVātśīputrīya’s monks had denied any knowledge of this Sūtra for the reason that it is not the Buddhavacana. Hence, they did not recite it in their community. Consequently, this Sūtra had already disappeared from the canon of the Vātśīputrīya sect. However, Vasubandhu, an interlocutor with this sect and the author of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya, argued that this same Sūtra is the Buddhavacana because it appears in the canon of two sects, the Saṃyuktāgāma of [Mūla] Sarvāstivādin and the Saṃyuttanikāya of the southern Theravāda. Additionally, evidence from Moggallīputta’s Kathāvatthu that is compiled during the Era of King Asoka indicates that the Vātśīputrīya’s monks (Pāli: Vajjiputtaka) accepted that Sūtra as the Buddhavacana. It is generally known that Kathāvatthu (of Theravāda’s canon) had been compiled much earlier than Abhidharmakośabhāṣya. Considering the time when the disputed Sūtra disappeared from Vātśīputrīya’s canon, one may conclude that it was lost sometime between the period of Moggallīputta and the composition of Abhidharmakośabhāṣya.