Publication: การอ้างเหตุผลแบบละข้อความในภาษาไทย : การศึกษาเชิงวิเคราะห์เฉพาะกรณีการอ้างเหตุผลแบบเงื่อนไขใน ทางการเมืองในนิตยสาร
View online Resources
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2013
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
th
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
Volume
Issue
Edition
Start Page
End Page
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
การอ้างเหตุผลแบบละข้อความในภาษาไทย : การศึกษาเชิงวิเคราะห์เฉพาะกรณีการอ้างเหตุผลแบบเงื่อนไขใน ทางการเมืองในนิตยสาร
Alternative Title(s)
Enthymeme in Thai language : an analytical study in the case of conditional argument concerning politics in Matichon Weekly Magazine
Author(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
The purposes of this research were: 1) to study an enthymeme of conditional argument in propositional logic in Thai language and 2) to analyze a reliability of an enthymeme of conditional argument in propositional logic in Thai language. This was an qualitative research. Data collected were from 26 articles titled: 2Yutha Bot Quarm6 (Military Article) and 2Malang Van Nai Rai Som6 (Flies in the Orange Field) of Matichon Weekly Magazine and documents which are both Thai and foreign texts of logic The results are that 64 enthymeme of conditional argument are found: 56 of a first order of enthymeme (87.50%), 4 of a second order of enthymeme (6.25%), and 4 of a third order of enthymeme (6.25%), This implies that arguers like to omit statements which are generally true. Only 2 Rules of Inference are found: 61 of Modus Ponens (95.31%), and 3 of Modus Tollens (4.69%). This implies that arguers prefer arguing with an affirmative statement to a negative statement. All arguments are valid. This implies that by nature arguers habitually argue with valid arguments. 2 cases of reliability of arguments are found: 59 of enthymemes are constructed with true premises, valid form and true conclusion and 5 of enthymemes are constructed with false premises, valid form and false conclusion. This implies that arguers prefer using a fact to support an argument to a false statement.
Table of contents
Description
Sponsorship
Degree Name
ศิลปศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต
Degree Level
ปริญญาโท
Degree Department
คณะศิลปศาสตร์
Degree Discipline
Degree Grantor(s)
มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์