Publication: Different Sequences of Feedback Types: Effectiveness, Attitudes, and Preferences
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2015
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
en
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
2287-0024
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
PASAA Journal
Volume
50
Issue
Edition
Start Page
31
End Page
64
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
Different Sequences of Feedback Types: Effectiveness, Attitudes, and Preferences
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to: 1) to compare the effects of different sequences of feedback types on the students’ writing ability and their effect size; 2) to compare the effects of the levels of general English proficiency (high, moderate, and low) on the students’ writing ability and their effect size; 3) to investigate the interaction effects between the different sequences of feedback types and levels of general English proficiency on the students’ writing ability; and 4) to survey the students preferences for selfcorrection, paper-pencil peer feedback, and the integration of Facebook and the peer feedback strategy. This study was of an experimental, 3x3 factorial design and was conducted with 108 engineering students with different levels of general English proficiency. The students were trained in how to do self-correction or how to provide effective peer feedback before doing the assigned tasks. Two-way ANOVA was employed for the data analysis for the first three research questions, and descriptive statisticsand content analysis were used for analyzing the data from the questionnaires, interviews, and reflective journals for the fourth research question. Pedagogical implications for EFL writing classes are discussed.