Publication: Medical Uncertainty and the Art of Communication: Exploring Modality Applied in Medical Journal Abstracts
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2021
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
en
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
2630-0672 (Print), 2672-9431 (Online)
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network
Volume
14
Issue
1
Edition
Start Page
604
End Page
646
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
Medical Uncertainty and the Art of Communication: Exploring Modality Applied in Medical Journal Abstracts
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
Medicine is a science dealing with uncertainty and the art of judging probability. For effective communication, doctors, researchers, or health sciences writers, need to master the use of modality whereby unreal situations can be discussed. How modal verbs — the most commonly used type of modality applied in the writing of health and medical sciences — are used in general English can differ from scientific contexts, and within different scientific fields a modal verb may not be used in the same way. This study aims to analyze the use of modal verbs in the abstracts of medical articles published in the past 5 years to enable researchers or medical writers to select the most suitable linguistic devices for their contexts. Modals were discovered to function variously in different parts of medical abstracts, with the highest number in the final part of the abstract structure. In the majority of the abstracts analyzed, usage was found not to be speculation on the part of the author but rather to address the evidence and circumstances. Modals were also found to be context-based and relate to the choices of the tense, voice, reality status, and situation type. The findings can benefit scientific writers and provide EAP, ESP, and EST instructors material for communicative practice.