Publication: Assessing the Relationship between Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use and Vocabulary Knowledge
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2015
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
en
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
2287-0024
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
PASAA Journal
Volume
49
Issue
Edition
Start Page
39
End Page
66
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
Assessing the Relationship between Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use and Vocabulary Knowledge
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
This study is an attempt to explore the correlation between direct and indirect vocabulary learning strategies along with the depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge. To this end, a sample of 145 low proficiency students who learn English as a Foreign Language (EFL) completed a questionnaire concerning vocabulary learning strategy use. Vocabulary Levels Test (Schmitt et al., 2001) and Word Associates Test (Read, 1993; 2004) were administered to measure the breadth and depth of lexical repertoire respectively. The results indicated that (a) direct strategies were frequently used by EFL students (except for direct cognitive analyzing strategy), and (b), indirect strategies were less frequently used strategies. Participants’ scores in strategy use were correlated significantly and positively with breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge. However, indirect strategy use had a higher level of correlation with two dimensions of vocabulary knowledge, implying that EFL students with a higher level of depth and breadth of lexical repertoire tended to use strategies that are more indirect. This highlights the importance of indirect strategies, e.g., self-planning, self-monitoring, and self-evaluating. These and other relevant pedagogical implications were discussed.