Publication: Metadiscourse Markers Analysis Used in Communication Research Articles
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2019
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
en
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
2408-1582
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences
Volume
15
Issue
3
Edition
Start Page
End Page
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
Metadiscourse Markers Analysis Used in Communication Research Articles
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the metadiscourse markers used in communication research articles in terms of studying; 1) the frequency of using metadiscourse markers, 2) the differences between the metadiscourse markers used in the introduction part and the discussion part of the communication research articles, and 3) the correlation of 14 metadiscourse markers in 4 categories of metadiscourse markers; self-mention words, attitudinal markers, boosters and hedge. The language data corpus used is 20 communication research articles and only the introduction parts and discussion parts of each research article were analyzed. The instruments used are 1) AntConc 3.2 computer program for research articles random and 2) PASW 18.0 computer program for statistical analysis. The findings revealed that: 1) the three most frequently used markers are attitudinal markers; adjective, booster; verb and hedge; modal verb, 2) there are 9 metadiscourse markers used in the introduction parts and the discussion parts that are significantly different and the other 5 markers are not significantly different, and 3) there are 13 metadiscourse markers used in the communication research articles that show correlation and 1 marker that shows no correlation.