Publication: การศึกษาแนวคิดเรื่องสัมมากัมมันตะในพุทธปรัชญาเถรวาท
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2016
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
th
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
Volume
Issue
Edition
Start Page
End Page
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
การศึกษาแนวคิดเรื่องสัมมากัมมันตะในพุทธปรัชญาเถรวาท
Alternative Title(s)
A Study of Concept on the Right Action in Theravada Buddhist Philosophy
Author(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
The objectives of this thesis paper were 1) to study the meaning and im portant of right action in Theravada Buddhist Philosophy 2) to study the concept of right action in Theravada Buddhist Philosophy, and 3) to analyze the concept of right action in Theravada Buddhist Philosophy .This study was a qualitative research . The data were collected from the primary source-Tipitaka and the secondary source-researches, and related other documents. The results of this research were as follows: From the study of righteousness in Theravada Buddhist philosophy, right action is the right thing to do, the right thing to do, or the physical action tha t does not entice oneself and others, which is the act leading to happiness. And physical expression with knowledge. Understand the correctness of the action. Considered to consider around the cover already. It also results in the practitioner developing himself towards the middle to reach the highest point. And reach in the cry It is a good way out There are three types of meaning: 1) abstinence from the libido is to kill, to destroy, to persecute, to torture, to make living things or all living creatures. No matter small animals or big animals. No man or Beast The intention to abstain from the offense is th at this provision is a deliberate intention to abstain w ithout intention, do not always have "intention" is not due to other reasons, so do not commit. But if you do not do it because you intend to abstain from it. This is the first feature. Refraining from The libel of righteousness. 2) The abstinence from the motto. Is a burglary. The encroachment o f wealth in Custody o f others Violation of ownership o f property o f others o f the collective or collective. It is unlawful for theft. The intention to refrain. From the guilty This is a provision that is intended to be intentionally abstained w ithout intention, do not have the "intention" always directed, not because of other reasons, so do not commit. But if you do not do it because you intend to abstain, this is the second feature of refraining from the m otto of the right mind. 2) Refraining from adultery. It is a misdemeanor, not to commit transgression in another's wife. Do not commit abuse in another's husband. The intention to abstain from any wrongdoing is that this is a deliberate intention to abstain from intentionally do not have to be "intentionally" always directed, not because there are other grounds for action. But if you do not do it because it was intended. Except that This is feature 3, the abstention from adultery.
Table of contents
Description
Sponsorship
Degree Name
ศาสนศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต
Degree Level
ปริญญาโท
Degree Department
บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย
Degree Discipline
Degree Grantor(s)
มหาวิทยาลัยมหามกุฏราชวิทยาลัย