Publication: Target-like Syntactic Representations of L1 Thai Learners: A Case of L2 English Number Agreement
Submitted Date
Received Date
Accepted Date
Issued Date
2015
Copyright Date
Announcement No.
Application No.
Patent No.
Valid Date
Resource Type
Edition
Resource Version
Language
en
File Type
No. of Pages/File Size
ISBN
ISSN
2630-0672 (Print), 2672-9431 (Online)
eISSN
DOI
Scopus ID
WOS ID
Pubmed ID
arXiv ID
item.page.harrt.identifier.callno
Other identifier(s)
Journal Title
LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network
Volume
8
Issue
2
Edition
Start Page
126
End Page
144
Access Rights
Access Status
Rights
Rights Holder(s)
Physical Location
Bibliographic Citation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Title
Target-like Syntactic Representations of L1 Thai Learners: A Case of L2 English Number Agreement
Alternative Title(s)
Author(s)
Author’s Affiliation
Author's E-mail
Editor(s)
Editor’s Affiliation
Corresponding person(s)
Creator(s)
Compiler
Advisor(s)
Illustrator(s)
Applicant(s)
Inventor(s)
Issuer
Assignee
Other Contributor(s)
Series
Has Part
Abstract
The study investigated the representations of L1 Thai learners on English number agreement, a form which is non-existent in Thai. It is hypothesized that the L2 learners have target-like syntactic representations of English number agreement according to the non-impairment view of the Missing Surface Inflectional Hypothesis (MSIH), and against the impairment view of the Failed Functional Feature Hypothesis (FFFH). The participants were 58 intermediate and 45 advanced Thai undergraduates. The study was conducted via two tests, a Cloze Test and a Grammatical Judgment Task. Both tests featured singular/plural head nouns with modification and irregular nouns. The results showed that the L2 learners’ accuracy on English number agreement was above 80% on the structures of singular/plural head with modification. However, deviant production was found on irregular nouns. The results indicated the learners’ target-like syntactic representations of English number agreement but incomplete knowledge of lexicon. The L2 learners can access Universal Grammar on the grammatical area not found in their L1. The participants were assumed to be less exposed to the irregular nouns featured in the study so those nouns in their lexicon were not tagged with target-like syntactic information. Since the results indicated that the L2 learners do not have syntactic impairment of English number agreement and incomplete knowledge of lexicon can explain the deviant production of the irregular nouns, FFFH is contradicted and MSIH is confirmed.