บาลีและสันสกฤต : Pali and Sanskrit

Permanent URI for this community

https://harrt.in.th/handle/123456789/4

Browse

Browsing บาลีและสันสกฤต : Pali and Sanskrit by Subject "Abhidharmakośabhāṣya"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Publication
    พระสูตรที่นิกายวาตสีปุตรียะไม่ยอมรับว่าเป็นพระพุทธพจน์: ศึกษาในคัมภีร์อภิธรรมโกศภาษยะและกถาวัตถุ
    เมธี พิทักษ์ธีระธรรม; ปิยาภรณ์ ว่องวรางกูร; พรพิมล ศรีหมอก; Pitakteeradham, Maythee; Wongwarangkool, Piyaphon; Srimork, Phonpimol (2019)
    This article exemplifi es a Sūtra that is claimed to not be ‘the word of the Buddha’ (Buddha- vacana) by Vātśīputrīya, a sect of Buddhism. This Sūtra is composed of verses presenting an argument between Śaila bhikṣuṇi and Māra. The VVātśīputrīya’s monks had denied any knowledge of this Sūtra for the reason that it is not the Buddhavacana. Hence, they did not recite it in their community. Consequently, this Sūtra had already disappeared from the canon of the Vātśīputrīya sect. However, Vasubandhu, an interlocutor with this sect and the author of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya, argued that this same Sūtra is the Buddhavacana because it appears in the canon of two sects, the Saṃyuktāgāma of [Mūla] Sarvāstivādin and the Saṃyuttanikāya of the southern Theravāda. Additionally, evidence from Moggallīputta’s Kathāvatthu that is compiled during the Era of King Asoka indicates that the Vātśīputrīya’s monks (Pāli: Vajjiputtaka) accepted that Sūtra as the Buddhavacana. It is generally known that Kathāvatthu (of Theravāda’s canon) had been compiled much earlier than Abhidharmakośabhāṣya. Considering the time when the disputed Sūtra disappeared from Vātśīputrīya’s canon, one may conclude that it was lost sometime between the period of Moggallīputta and the composition of Abhidharmakośabhāṣya.