Publication:
关键期假设与心灵学派对语言习得机制的观点

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPornrattananukul, Apisara
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-15T14:25:33Z
dc.date.available2023-12-15T14:25:33Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.issuedBE2553
dc.description.abstract本文主要目的是为了回答“什么是‘关键期假设’?？，这一假设与心灵学派对第二语言学习者的语言习得机制的看法有何不同？” 的问题。前者可以在第一部分从很多学者对这一假设的观点得出答案。为了找到后者的答案，我们需要通过前者与心灵学派对第二语言学习者的语言习得机制的观点来进行分析。
dc.description.abstractThe article focuses on the question ‘what is the critical period?’ and finding out the different perspective to the language acquisition device of second language learners between critical period hypothesis and mentalism. Firstly, it is useful to bear in mind the perspective of many experts on critical period hypothesis and then go through the perspective from mentalism. Consequently, we have a discussion about the difference between the two of them.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://harrt.in.th/handle/123456789/3589
dc.language.isocn
dc.subject关键期假设
dc.subject心灵学派
dc.subject语言习得机制
dc.subject第二语言习得
dc.subjectCritial Perios Hypothesis
dc.subjectMentalism
dc.subjectLanguage Acquisition Device
dc.subjectSecond Language Acquisition
dc.subject.isced0232 วรรณคดีและภาษาศาสตร์
dc.subject.oecd6.2 ภาษาและวรรณคดี
dc.title关键期假设与心灵学派对语言习得机制的观点
dc.title.alternativeThe Perspective of Critical Period Hypothesis and Cognition to Language Acquisition Deviceen
dc.typeบทความวารสาร (Journal Article)
dspace.entity.typePublication
harrt.itemID10
harrt.researchAreaภาษาศาสตร์ภาษาจีน
harrt.researchGroupภาษาจีน
harrt.researchTheme.1การรับภาษาที่สอง (Second (Foreign) Language Acquisition)
mods.location.urlhttps://journal.mfu.ac.th/index.php/jsino/issue/view/7
oaire.citation.endPage150
oaire.citation.startPage138
oaire.citation.title汉学研究
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Sinologyen
oaire.citation.titleวารสารจีนวิทยาth
oaire.citation.volume4
Files
Collections
ภาษาศาสตร์ภาษาจีน